본문바로가기

Original Article

A Multicenter Study of Antifungal Use and Species Distribution and Antifungal Susceptibilities of Candida Isolates in South Korea

Abstract

Background: Candidiasis control should include monitoring the epidemiology and resistance to various antifungal agents. In this study, the researchers investigated the Candida species recovered from clinical specimens at particular geographic areas or hospitals.

Objective: The present study is geared toward the evaluation of antifungal drug usage at Korean hospitals in 2016. It is also essential that species distribution and antifungal susceptibilities of Candida isolates should be looked into to provide important data that can help devise therapeutic strategies to control the disease.

Methods: Systemic antifungal agent usage over a one-year period was investigated at 10 Korean hospitals. Identification and antifungal susceptibility tests were performed on clinical isolates of the Candida species, which were collected over a three-month period.

Results: The total antifungal usage in each hospital ranged from 7.7 to 158.9 defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1,000 patient days. Fluconazole was most commonly used (37.1%), followed by amphotericin B (30.6%), itraconazole (9.7%), echinocandins (8.8%), voriconazole (7.5%), and posaconazole (6.3%), respectively. Among 274 Candida isolates, C. albicans was the most frequently recovered (51.1%), followed by C. glabrata (15.7%), C. tropicalis (15.0%), and C. parapsilosis (13.5%), respectively. Through the application of either species-specific clinical breakpoints or epidemiological cutoff values to Candida isolates, the non-susceptibility rates to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and micafungin were found in 20.7%, 5.6%, 0%, and 0% of isolates, respectively.

Conclusion: This nationwide multicenter study showed that total antifungal use varied considerably according to each hospital. Non-susceptibility to fluconazole should be further monitored, considering the drug's frequent use in Korea.



Keywords



Antifungal susceptibility Antifungal usage Candida Multicenter surveillance



INTRODUCTION

Candida species are commonly found as normal flora, but they can cause a variety of opportunistic infections such as oropharyngitis, esophagitis, vulvovaginitis, urinary tract infection, meningitis, endophthalmitis, endocarditis, peritonitis, osteomyelitis, and candidemia1,2. Candidiasis control should include monitoring the Candida species' epidemiology and resistance to various antifungal agents1,2. Antifungal usage is associated with the distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species3-5. According to previous multicenter studies conducted in South Korea since 20043,5,6, the pattern of antifungal drug usage, the rank order of occurrence, and antifungal susceptibilities of disease-causing Candida species varied across hospitals and different time periods. This multicenter study was performed in order to investigate the antifungal drug usage in Korean hospitals and the antifungal susceptibility of Candida species recovered from clinically relevant specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective surveillance study was conducted in 10 Korean hospitals (A-J). Data was collected over a one-year period regarding the usage of systemic antifungal agents by patients admitted in a particular hospital. This was then determined by calculating the number of defined daily doses per 1,000 patient days (DDD/1,000 PD), as specified by the WHO ATC/ DDD system (www.whocc.no/atcddd/) and DDD measurement methodology7. The non-duplicated clinical isolates of the Candida species, which were collected from clinically relevant specimens over a three-month period (from October 2016 to December 2016), were sent to Chonnam National University Hospital for species identification and antifungal susceptibility testing. The identification results of Candida species were obtained using the conventional laboratory tests of each hospital. After gathering the results, the final identification was performed using CHROMagar Candida (BBL; Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA), VITEK 2 system with a VITEK 2 YST card (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Étoile, France), MALDI Biotyper (software version 3.1, reference database version 4.0.0.1, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA), or sequencing, if further confirmation is needed8. The antifungal susceptibility test was performed to measure their resistance to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and micafungin, and it was done using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method M609. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each isolate was categorized by applying CLSI clinical breakpoints (CBPs) or epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs)10,11.

RESULTS

The data in Table 1 suggest that the total antifungal use varied considerably in 10 selected hospitals, ranging from 7.7 to 158.9 DDD/1,000 PD, with fluconazole being the most commonly used agent (with an average of 18.6 DDD/1,000 PD, or 37.1% of total DDD/1,000 PD), followed by amphotericin B (15.3, 30.6%), itraconazole (4.9, 9.7%), voriconazole (3.8, 7.5%), posaconazole (3.1, 6.3%), caspofungin (2.6, 5.2%), micafungin (1.6, 3.2%), and anidulafungin (0.2, 0.4%), respectively. Table 2 summarizes the species identification and in vitro susceptibility to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and micafungin for 274 Candida isolates obtained from clinically relevant specimens over a three-month period. C. albicans (n=140, 51.1%) was the most commonly recovered, followed by 43 C. glabrata (15.7%), 41 C. tropicalis (15.0%), 37 C. parapsilosis (13.5%), 4 C. krusei (1.5%), 3 C. guilliermondii (1.1%), 2 C. auris (0.7%), 1 C. fabianii (0.4%), 1 C. lusitaniae (0.4%), 1 C. magnoliae (0.4%), and 1 C. pelliculosa (0.4%) isolates. All the isolates showed an MIC range of 0.125 to > 64 μg/mL for fluconazole, 0.03~8 μg/mL for voriconazole, 0.25~2 μg/mL for amphotericin B, and 0.015~ 2 μg/mL for micafungin. Upon applying CBPs or ECVs to available Candida species, the resistance and non-susceptible rates for these species to fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and micafungin were found to be 5.2% and 20.7%; 3.3% and 5.6%; 0.0% and 0.0%; and 0.0% and 0.0%, respectively.

Antifungals

Antifungal drug use by hospitals (defined daily dose/1,000 patient days)

Average

Total
(%)

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

Azoles

115.3

37.1

46.5

27.1

11.2

21.8

13.3

12.4

12.9

6.2

30.4

303.9
(60.6)

Fluconazole

45.0

30.1

27.9

25.3

8.5

8.7

11.5

11.1

12.6

5.4

18.6

186.0
(37.1)

Itraconazole

40.8

0.6

2.4

0.6

1.1

2.5

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.4

4.9

48.6
(9.7)

Voriconazole

15.0

2.4

12.2

1.3

1.7

3.1

0.4

0.9

0.4

0.5

3.8

37.8

(7.5)

Posaconazole

14.5

4.1

4.1

0.0

0.0

7.5

1.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

3.1

31.4

(6.3)

Amphotericin B*

34.3

50.2

35.4

4.0

16.9

4.7

3.3

2.5

2.2

0.0

15.3

153.3

(30.6)

Echinocandins

9.3

13.1

9.1

1.4

2.6

2.6

3.1

0.9

0.4

1.5

4.4

44.0

(8.8)

Caspofungin

3.0

12.4

2.9

1.4

1.4

1.8

1.8

0.1

0.3

0.9

2.6

26.1

(5.2)

Micafungin

6.3

0.7

5.3

0.0

0.6

0.7

0.9

0.8

0.0

0.5

1.6

15.8

(3.2)

Anidulafungin

0.0

0.0

0.9

0.0

0.5

0.1

0.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

2.0

(0.4)

Total

158.9

100.4

91.0

32.5

30.6

29.1

19.7

15.8

15.5

7.7

50.1

501.2

(100)

Table 1. Antifungal drug use in 10 Korean hospitals over a one-year period (2016) *This category included the lipid formulations of amphotericin B

Antifungal agents and
Candida species

Number of isolates

MIC (μg/mL)

Number (%) of isolates classified by
CBPs or ECVs

Range

50%

90%

R

SDD or I

Total

Fluconazole

C. albicans

140

0.125~2

0.25

0.5

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

C. glabrata

43

4~>64

8

32

3 (7.0)

40 (93.0)

43 (100)

C. tropicalis

41

0.125~8

0.25

1

1. (2.4)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.4)

C. parapsilosis

37

0.25~16

1

4

3 (8.1)

2 (5.4)

5 (13.5)

C. krusei

4

32~>64

4 (100)

NA

4 (100)

C. guilliermondii

3

0.25~>64

1 (33.3)

NA

1 (33.3)

C. auris

2

>64

NA

NA

NA

C. lusitaniae

1

>64

1 (100)

NA

1 (100)

C. pelliculosa

1

>64

1 (100)

NA

1 (100)

Other Candida species*

2

2-64

NA

NA

NA

Total

274

0.125~>64

 

 

14 (5.2)

42 (15.6)

56 (20.7)

Voriconazole

C. albicans

140

0.03~0.5

0.03

0.03

0 (0.0)

1 (0.7)

1 (0.7)

C. glabrata

43

0.03~4

0.5

0.5

3 (7.0)

NA

3 (7.0)

C. tropicalis

41

0.03~1

0.06

0.06

1 (2.4)

0 (0.0)

1 (2.4)

C. parapsilosis

37

0.03~0.5

0.06

0.125

0 (0.0)

3 (8.1)

3 (8.1)

C. krusei

4

0.5~4

1 (25.0)

2 (50.0)

3 (75.0)

C. guilliermondii

3

0.25~8

2 (66.7)

NA

2 (66.7)

C. auris

2

2

NA

NA

NA

C. lusitaniae

1

2

1 (100)

NA

1 (100)

C. pelliculosa

1

4

1 (100)

NA

1 (100)

Other Candida species

2

0.06~0.125

NA

NA

NA

Total

274

0.03~8

 

 

9 (3.3)

6 (2.2)

15 (5.6)

Amphotericin B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C. albicans

140

0.25~2

0.5

0.5

0 (0.0)

NA

0 (0.0)

C. glabrata

43

0.25~1

1

1

0 (0.0)

NA

0 (0.0)

C. tropicalis

41

0.5~1

1

1

0 (0.0)

NA

0 (0.0)

C. parapsilosis

37

0.25-1

0.5

1

0 (0.0)

NA

0 (0.0)

C. krusei

4

1

 

 

0 (0.0)

NA

0 (0.0)

C. guilliermondii

3

0.25~0.5

 

 

0 (0.0)

NA

0 (0.0)

C. auris

2

0.5~1

 

 

NA

NA

NA

C. lusitaniae

1

0.5

 

 

0 (0.0)

NA

0 (0.0)

C. pelliculosa

1

1

NA

NA

NA

Other Candida species*

2

0.25

NA

NA

NA

Total

274

0.25~2

0 (0.0)

NA

0 (0.0)

Micafungin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C. albicans

140

0.015~0.06

0.015

0.015

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

C. glabrata

43

0.015~0.03

0.015

0.03

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

C. tropicalis

41

0.015~0.06

0.015

0.03

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

C. parapsilosis

37

0.015~2

1

1

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

C. krusei

4

0.015~0.25

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

C. guilliermondii

3

0.5~1

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

C. auris

2

0.015

 

 

NA

NA

NA

C. lusitaniae

1

0.06

 

 

0 (0.0)

NA

0 (0.0)

C. pelliculosa

1

0.015

 

 

NA

NA

NA

Other Candida species*

2

0.06~0.125

 

 

NA

NA

NA

Total

274

0.015-2

 

 

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

Table 2. Antifungal susceptibilities of 274 clinical isolates of Candida species obtained from 10 Korean hospitals over three months *Other Candida species included C. fabianii (one isolate) and C. magnoliae (one isolate) †All C. krusei isolates are considered as resistant to fluconazole, irrespective of the MIC ‡The results were analyzed by ECVs11 Abbreviations: MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; CBP, clinical breakpoint; ECV, epidemiological cutoff value; SDD, susceptible dose-dependent; I, intermediate; R, resistant; NA, not available
DISCUSSION

This nationwide multicenter study aims to investigate the antifungal drug usage and the antifungal susceptibility of Candida species recovered from clinically relevant specimens. We found that the total antifungal use varied considerably according to each hospital. The average total usage of antifungals was 50.1 DDD/1,000 PD, which was similar to reports shown by previous Korean multicenter studies (63.2 DDD/ 1,000 PD in 2011 and 39.2 in 2005)3,5; however, the pattern of antifungal agent usage was different in each hospital. Fluconazole was the most commonly used agent in seven hospitals, while amphotericin B was the most commonly used in three hospitals, specifically hospitals B, C, and E. The average usages of fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin, and micafungin showed a 0.6-, 0.4-, 0.8-, 1.2-, 1.6-, and 1.1-fold increase, respectively, compared with those found in the 2011 study10. Consistent with previous studies, fluconazole was still the most commonly used antifungal agent5, but the overall echinocandin use has increased (average of 4.4 DDD/1,000 PD and 8.8% of total DDD/1,000 PD in this study; 3.1 DDD/1,000 PD and 4.9% in 2011; 0.5 DDD/1,000 PD and 1.2% in 2005)3,5 as well. The use of fluconazole has been associated with an increased risk of candidemia caused by non-albicans Candida species due to their inherently higher level of resistance to certain antifungal agents5. In addition, the increasing trend in echinocandin use is important because it could pose a risk of emerging echinocandin-resistant Candida species4.

The overall epidemiology of the Candida species agreed with the data of previous studies conducted in Korea3,6. More importantly, in the current study, C. glabrata was the most frequently found non-albicans Candida species, followed by C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis, while the 2011 study found slightly different rates, where C. parapsilosis (17.8%) was the most common non-albicans Candida species, followed by C. glabrata (14.4%) and C. tropicalis (12.7%)6. When applying CBPs, 11 of 265 Candida isolates were found to be resistant to fluconazole, specifically three C. glabrata, one C. tropicalis, three C. parapsilosis, and four C. krusei isolates. The overall resistance rate was not much higher than that of other geographic regions12,13. The fluconazole resistance and non-susceptibility rates, however, showed a 2.0- and 1.3-fold increase, respectively, compared with the data provided by previous Korean studies (2.6% and 16.4% in 2011, respetively)5. Moreover, among nine isolates of uncommon Candida species, five showed fluconazole MICs of > 64 μg/mL (two C. auris, one C. guilliermondii, one C. lusitaniae, and one C. pelliculosa isolates). Recently, C. auris has been highlighted to be less susceptible to fluconazole compared with the other Candida species, and it was reported to have developed a high-level resistance to fluconazole like that of C. glabrata14. In addition, C. auris was reported to be misidentified as C. haemulonii by the conventional identification method8,14. In the present study, two C. auris isolates were identified as C. haemulonii using conventional laboratory tests conducted in each particular hospital, which required sequencing to confirm the identification. Two candidemia cases with echinocandin-resistant Candida isolates (C. albicans and C. glabrata) were reported in South Korea15; however, the researchers found no Candida isolate that was resistant to micafungin, confirming the low resistance rates of echinocandins in South Korea when compared with those of the traits of micafungin that were documented in the previous study of other geographic regions, such as 0.4% in North America, 0.5% in Europe, 0% in Latin America, and 0.3% in the Asia Pacific region12.

CONCLUSION

We investigated the nationwide antifungal use, species distribution, and antifungal susceptibility in South Korea. The overall antifungal usage was similar with the established previous usage, but the use of echinocandins has increased, which might affect echinocandin non-susceptibility rates in Candida species. The Candida species distribution was similar as it was in the past, but the rank order and frequency of non-albicans Candida species was changing. The overall resistance rates of Candida species were still low, but fluconazole resistance and non-susceptibility rates have increased in South Korea. Although echinocandin resistance is still uncommon in Korea, we should be aware of its emergence in the near future, considering the increment of echinocandin use.



References


1. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Epidemiology of invasive can- didiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007;20:133-163
Google Scholar 

2. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62:e1-50
Google Scholar 

3. Kim SH, Shin JH, Kim EC, Lee K, Kim MN, Lee WG, et al. The relationship between antifungal usage and antifungal susceptibility in clinical isolates of Candida: a multicenter Korean study. Med Mycol 2009;47:296-304
Google Scholar 

4. Fournier P, Schwebel C, Maubon D, Vesin A, Lebeau B, Foroni L, et al. Antifungal use influences Candida species distribution and susceptibility in the intensive care unit. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:2880-2886
Google Scholar 

5. Won EJ, Shin JH, Choi MJ, Lee WG, Park YJ, Uh Y, et al. Antifungal susceptibilities of bloodstream isolates of Candida species from nine hospitals in Korea: application of new antifungal breakpoints and relationship to antifungal usage. PLoS One 2015;10:e0118770
Google Scholar 

6. Won EJ, Shin JH, Lee WK, Koo SH, Kim SY, Park YJ, et al. Distribution of yeast and mold species isolated from clinical specimens at 12 hospitals in Korea during 2011. Ann Clin Microbiol 2013;16:92-100
Google Scholar 

7. Merlo J, Wessling A, Melander A. Comparison of dose standard units for drug utilisation studies. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1996;50:27-30
Google Scholar 

8. Kim TH, Kweon OJ, Kim HR, Lee MK. Identification of uncommon Candida species using commercial identification systems. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2016;26:2206 -2213
Google Scholar 

9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. 1st ed. CLSI supplement M60. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017


10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Fourth informational supplement, M27-S4. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012


11. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Progress in antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. by use of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods, 2010 to 2012. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50:2846-2856
Google Scholar 

12. Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Woosley LN, Jones RN, Castanheira M. Echinocandin and triazole antifungal susceptibility profiles for clinical opportunistic yeast and mold isolates collected from 2010 to 2011: application of new CLSI clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cutoff values for characterization of geographic and temporal trends of antifungal resistance. J Clin Microbiol 2013;51:2571 -2581
Google Scholar 

13. Tan TY, Hsu LY, Alejandria MM, Chaiwarith R, Chinniah T, Chayakulkeeree M, et al. Antifungal susceptibility of invasive Candida bloodstream isolates from the Asia-Pacific region. Med Mycol 2016;54:471-477
Google Scholar 

14. Lee WG, Shin JH, Uh Y, Kang MG, Kim SH, Park KH, et al. First three reported cases of nosocomial fungemia caused by Candida auris. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49: 3139-3142
Google Scholar 

15. Park MS, Park JE, Song DJ, Huh HJ, Park S, Kang CI, et al. First case of echinocandin-resistant Candida albicans in Korea. Ann Lab Med 2017;37:556-558
Google Scholar 

Congratulatory MessageClick here!

Download this article