본문바로가기

Opportunistic Cutaneous Infections in Immunocompromised Patients

Abstract

The spectrum of conditions that lead to an immunocompromised state in patients is broad. Primary immunodeficiencies often result from genetic mutations. Acquired immune dysfunction may result from infection-mediated immune deficiency, underlying diseases, and medications. The immunocompromised patient may manifest a variety of cutaneous conditions that can be challenging to diagnose and manage. Among cutaneous manifestations, the major category seen in immunocompromised patients is infections. Immunocompromised patients may exhibit either unusually severe or prolonged skin infections with common pathogens or infections with opportunistic organisms. Cell-mediated immunity is driven by CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells via antigens presented on MHC class I and macrophages activated by Th1 cells. It defends against intracellular pathogens, including mycobacteria, filamentous bacteria, dimorphic or opportunistic fungi, and some protozoa through apoptosis and cell lysis. Impaired cell-mediated immunity also predisposes to reactivation of latent viruses. Neutropenia is defined as a decrease in the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) below 1,500/μL. Skin flora can be pathogenic and cause bacterial sepsis in neutropenic patients. Hospitalized neutropenic patients have a higher risk of developing systemic infection due to opportunistic angioinvasive fungi. Primary and secondary humoral immunodeficiencies can affect B cell production and function, antibody formation and function, and the effectiveness of the complement pathway. Deficiency in any of these components can put patients at particular risk of infection with encapsulated bacteria by impairing opsonization for phagocytosis. This review focuses on opportunistic cutaneous infections occurring in immunocompromised patients.



Keywords



Cellular immunity Humoral immunity Immunocompromised host Neutropenia Opportunistic infections



1. INTRODUCTION

Immunocompromised patients develop either unusually severe or prolonged skin infections with common pathogens or opportunistic organisms. A wide spectrum of conditions may contribute to the development of an immunocom- promised state, ranging from primary immunodeficiencies (caused by genetic mutations) to acquired immune dysfunc- tion resulting from infection-mediated immune deficiency (e.g., acquired immune deficiency syndrome [AIDS]), comorbidities (e.g., malignancies and diabetes mellitus), and medications (e.g., chemotherapy and biologic agents)1. This review offers a practical, clinically oriented approach for characterizing rare opportunistic cutaneous infections in immunocompro- mised patients, with special emphasis on epidemiological and diagnostic considerations relevant to South Korea. These infections may be rare or potentially fatal and may present with distinctive cutaneous manifestations or remain relatively undetected by dermatologists.

2. CELLULAR IMMUNODEFICIENCY

Physiologically, cell-mediated immunity (CMI) defends against intracellular pathogens through apoptosis and cell lysis2. It is driven by CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells via antigens pre- sented on the major histocompatibility complex class I and macrophages activated by type 1 T helper (Th1) cells. As a result, immunocompromised patients are susceptible to opportunistic infections and are at an increased risk of latent viral reactivation.

2.1 Cutaneous tuberculosis (TB)

Cutaneous TB is typically acquired through exogenous inoculation, contiguous spread, or hematogenous spread3. One such entity is TB cutis orificialis, which arises from auto- inoculation of mucosal surfaces or spread from advanced pulmonary, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary TB, and occurs in patients with low immunity. It usually appears as one or more ulcerative, painful lesions in the oral, genital, or anal mucosa and periorificial skin3,4. Miliary or disseminated TB is another life-threatening form of TB that occurs primarily in children and infants following an infection, such as measles or scarlet fever, that diminishes their immune response. Another example is TB re-emergence in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and having a CD4 count <100 cells/μL.

Cutaneous TB in immunocompromised patients is char- acterized by a multibacillary form in which the lesions are often closely packed and teeming with mycobacteria (acid-fast bacilli [AFB])3. Given that diminished CMI may obscure the development of characteristic histopathological features, such as caseating granulomas, AFB staining should be per- formed when mycobacterial infection is suspected5. However, the results of the tuberculin test and interferon-gamma release assay may be negative or indeterminate in immunocompro- mised patients due to impaired host defense mechanisms4,6. The management of cutaneous TB follows the same treat- ment principles as systemic TB.

2.2 Non-tuberculous mycobacteria

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) can be found in soil, water, and almost anywhere in the world. These infections predominantly occur in immunocompromised patients or after skin trauma in immunocompetent patients3. NTM infections due to rapidly growing mycobacterial (RGM) species (in- cluding M. fortuitum, M. abscessus, and M. chelonae) are associated with skin trauma and injection sites. In particular, M. chelonae and M. abscessus infections present as dissem- inated cutaneous infections in immunocompromised patients3. It has been noted that patients with RGM infections with multiple lesions are significantly more likely to be receiving immunosuppressive therapy than those presenting with a single lesion7. In immunocompromised patients, cutaneous infections caused by slowly growing mycobacteria, such as M. kansasii or the M. avium complex, usually occur after hematologic dissemination from pulmonary lesions8,9. Since NTM is resistant to most anti-tuberculous drugs, the treatment is often long and difficult3. In immunocompetent patients, therapy consists of single or dual therapy with drugs such as clarithromycin, minocycline, doxycycline, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), or combination therapy with ethambutol and rifampicin3. Immunocompromised patients are treated for a longer duration and may require long-term suppressive therapy2.

2.3 Filamentous bacteria

Actinomycetoma is caused by Gram-positive, branching, filamentous bacteria, most commonly Nocardia and Actino- madura species. In contrast, Actinomyces, a commensal flora of the oropharynx, gastrointestinal tract, and urogenital tract, is an uncommon cause of actinomycetoma. Patients with esophageal actinomycosis are usually immunosuppressed due to malignancy, HIV, or solid organ transplant10. Nocardia is a common environmental pathogen. In recent years, the incidence of Nocardia infection cases and detections has increased significantly, presumably because of an increase in the number of immunosuppressed people, such as those receiving organ transplants or undergoing cancer chemo- therapy11. Furthermore, immunocompromised status was associated with an increased risk of disseminated infection (Fig. 1) and poor outcomes11. Actinomycosis and nocardiosis have several distinct clinical manifestations, ranging from superficial skin and soft tissue infection to chronic mycetoma form. Furthermore, actinomycetomas should be differen- tiated from eumycetomas, which are deep fungal infections2. Patients with actinomycosis require prolonged (6-12 months) high-dose penicillin G or amoxicillin therapy10; however, in case of actinomycetoma or Nocardia infection, TMP-SMX and amikacin are used in combination, and surgical excision is performed if necessary2.

Figure 1. Clinical picture of disseminated nocardiosis involving the soft tissues, brain, and lungs in a 70-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) receiving intravenous immunoglobulin and high-dose corticosteroids for an SLE flare. Nocardia pseudobrasiliensis was isolated from abscess and blood cultures. Surgical drainage and nine months of antimicrobial therapy, initially with amikacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, resulted in clinical improvement. (A) Purulent drainage from a cutaneous abscess during incision and drainage. (B) Brain magnetic resonance imaging showing multiple rim-enhancing masses suggestive of brain abscesses (blue arrows). (C) Chest computed tomography showing multiple pulmonary nodules and cavitary consolidation in the left upper lobe.

2.4 Fungi

2.4.1 Dimorphic fungi

Common dimorphic fungi, including Blastomyces, Cocci- dioides, Histoplasma, Talaromyces, and Emergomyces species, are found in specific geographical environments, existing as molds and transforming into pathogenic yeasts (or spherules) at human body temperature. The lungs are the most common site of endemic mycoses, with disease course ranging from subclinical respiratory infection to life-threatening systemic disease2. Under healthy conditions, T-cells release interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), which activate macrophages to destroy the engulfed fungi. In hosts with compromised CMI, this cytokine signaling is lacking or blunted, allowing the fungus to replicate unchecked and disseminate via the bloodstream12.

Histoplasmosis is caused by Histoplasma capsulatum var. capsulatum and is extremely rare in South Korea. Lungs are the most common site of primary infection, with 11% of patients with AIDS developing skin manifestations13. Histo- plasmosis tends to disseminate, resulting in papular lesions on the face and the trunk2. Talaromycosis, caused by Talaromyces marneffei, is another opportunistic infection seen in indi- viduals with advanced HIV infection in endemic tropical and subtropical regions of Southeast Asia and southern China. It often presents with papular skin lesions with central necrosis or umbilication14.

2.4.2 Encapsulated yeasts

Cryptococcosis, caused by Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, presents mainly as meningoencephalitis; however, the disease may range from asymptomatic lung colonization to systemic dissemination. The unique fungal polysaccharide capsule of Cryptococcus suppresses the innate immune recognition of the fungus; therefore, a strong adap- tive immune response, including CD4+ helper T-cell activity, is required for fungal control. Cutaneous cryptococcosis typically occurs in patients with advanced HIV/AIDS13, presenting as subcutaneous papules and nodules on the face and neck. It should be suspected in patients presenting with papulonod- ular necrotizing lesions with central umbilication resembling molluscum contagiosum2.

2.4.3 Candida

Candida species are opportunistic pathogens capable of causing a variety of mucocutaneous and systemic diseases in immunocompromised hosts. Chronic mucocutaneous candi- diasis comprises a heterogeneous group of syndromes char- acterized by recurrent or chronic noninvasive symptomatic infections of the skin, nails, and mucous membranes, usually caused by C. albicans15. Notably, oral candidiasis is a marker for an increased rate of progression to AIDS16, and the pre- sence of oral candidiasis in AIDS may be associated with poor survival in some patients17. Cutaneous candidiasis often involves intertriginous skin, with some patients developing markedly thickened areas with gross hyperkeratosis18. Par- onychia is a common clinical manifestation of cutaneous candidiasis often accompanied by extensive nail plate involve- ment and total dystrophic onychomycosis18,19. Various host factors that increase susceptibility to superficial infections due to Candida species include autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome, gain-of-function (GOF) STAT1 defects, CARD9 defects, and autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy syndrome15. In contrast, invasive candi- diasis occurs predominantly in the setting of a clear breach in host defense, risk factors for which include substantial disruption of the mucosal barrier (e.g., chemotherapy-induced mucositis) combined with underlying neutropenia20. C. albicans is the predominant cause of hematogenous Candida infections and invasive candidiasis worldwide, although the incidence of infection with non-albicans species is increas- ing20,21. A systematic review of 100 documented cases of disseminated candidiasis with skin involvement found that 68% of cases were caused by C. tropicalis, followed by C. krusei (15%)22. The systematic review also noted that the most frequent underlying disease was acute leukemia, and the most frequent pattern of skin lesions was erythematous or purpuric maculopapular lesions (44%), followed by purpuric or erythematous papular lesions with a pale center (22%), nodules (17%), and subcutaneous abscess (6%)22.

2.5 Protozoa

Leishmaniasis is a zoonotic protozoan parasitic disease transmitted by sandflies infected with species of Leishmania. Although an estimated 600,000-1,000,000 new cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and 50,000-90,000 new cases of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) occur worldwide each year23, it is extremely rare in South Korea. In immunocompetent in- dividuals, it most commonly manifests as CL, which presents as plaques with indurated borders and central ulceration that may heal spontaneously with atrophic scarring2. However, VL is an opportunistic infection in persons with HIV/AIDS or other causes of CMI suppression24. Infected individuals typically develop a strong Th1-mediated immune response25; however, if CMI is impaired, parasites may remain dormant in scars or lymph nodes after treatment and reactivate24. Giemsa-stained skin scrapings typically show many intracellular amastigotes inside a mononuclear cell cytoplasm25. Lately, more sensitive molecular diagnostic methods, particularly polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are being used to confirm the diagnosis of leishmaniasis2. There is no universally accepted first-line treatment of CL; the available systemic therapies are associated with substantial toxicities and show variable efficacy across different Leishmania species. Because the host's CMI plays a critical role in controlling the infection, treatment for CL should be tailored according to the patient, the infecting Leishmania species, and the region in which the infection was acquired26.

2.6 Latent virus

Among viral pathogens, recurrent human herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection is common in immunocompromised patients. Chronic ulcerative perianal disease caused by HSV-2 was one of the first features of AIDS to be reported27. Immunocompromised patients may develop further severe manifestations of HSV infection (Fig. 2). Additionally, refrac- tory or multi-dermatomal varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection can be seen with iatrogenic immunosuppression. A study reported that the increased risk of VZV reactivation observed with Janus kinase inhibitors may be attributable to their suppression of type I and II interferon signaling, which plays a critical role in maintaining VZV latency and preventing viral reactivation (Fig. 3)28.

Figure 2. Extensive crusted and erosive lesions involving the perioral region and philtrum resulting from herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection in a 56-year-old woman with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Polymerase chain reaction testing of the lesion was positive for HSV type 1.
Figure 3. Multi-dermatomal herpes zoster infection in a 27-year-old man receiving upadacitinib for severe atopic dermatitis; he had no other significant medical history. Three months after dose escalation to upadacitinib 30 mg daily, the patient developed multi-dermatomal herpes zoster. Grouped vesicles and crusted lesions involving the anterior chest and both axillae (A), the posterior trunk and left upper arm (B), and the right side of the neck (C).

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are generally asymptom- atic or mild in immunocompetent individuals. CMV remains dormant over the life of the host in myeloid cells, reactivating in the setting of immunosuppression29. Cutaneous CMV infection is rare but may indicate disseminated disease and an unfavorable prognosis. A clinicopathologic series including older patients reported approximately 85% mortality within six months30. A recent case series described cutaneous ulcers caused by CMV in patients with malignancy and organ transplantation; three of the four patients died soon after diagnosis of CMV infection despite ganciclovir treatment29. Ulceration is the most common presentation of CMV infec- tion; other cutaneous findings include necrotizing vasculitis, thrombosis leading to limb ischemia, and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome29.

3. NEUTROPENIA

Neutrophils are the primary mediators of rapid innate host defense against most bacterial and fungal pathogens that activate before the complex humoral and lymphocyte cellular processes of acquired immunity act on an infection31. Thus, neutropenic patients are particularly susceptible to bacterial and angioinvasive fungal infections. Neutropenia is defined as a decrease in the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) below 1,500/μL. Patients can develop neutropenia due to decreased production in the bone marrow or increased peripheral destruction. It can arise in childhood from congenital factors or in adulthood through acquired factors32. The risk of infec- tion increases with the severity and duration of neutropenia, particularly in patients with severe (ANC < 500/μL), profound (ANC < 100/μL), or prolonged (>7 days) neutropenia33.

3.1 Invasive bacterial infections

Common pathogens that cause bacterial sepsis in neutro- penic patients include both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, which can be acquired from skin disruption due to an intravenous catheter, proced- ures, or surgeries32. Lately, hospital- and community-acquired Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections are being reported as an emerging opportunistic pathogen34-36. It is an aerobic Gram-negative ubiquitous bacillus with low virulence and is considered an uncommon pathogen in immunocompetent individuals; however, in immunosuppressed hosts, especially neutropenic individuals, on chemotherapy or broad-spectrum antibiotics, S. maltophilia can cause neutropenic septicemia34.

3.2 Angioinvasive fungi

Hospitalized neutropenic patients are also at a greater risk of contracting angioinvasive fungal infections from Aspergillus, Mucor, Rhizopus, and Fusarium32. Filamentous hyphal struc- tures are too large for macrophages to engulf; thus, neutro- phils become the key defenders against fungi by releasing reactive oxygen species and antifungal enzymes from their granules and forming neutrophil extracellular traps that capture and damage fungi37. Neutropenic patients lack these defense mechanisms, making them particularly susceptible to opportunistic angioinvasive fungal infections that can in- vade blood vessel walls, resulting in fungemia and significant morbidity and mortality. Primary cutaneous fungal infections can occur at sites of percutaneous damage from an intra- venous catheter or via respiratory or gut inoculation32,38. Other sources of primary skin infections include onychomycosis caused by Aspergillus or Fusarium39-41. Skin involvement is the first clue in most of the disseminated fusariosis cases and often occurs at an early stage of the disease. A study reported that among 16 patients with fusariosis with dis- seminated skin lesions, 11 had a recent history of Fusarium cellulitis at the site of onychomycosis, 3 had local trauma, and 2 had an insect bite, corroborating that skin was the primary site of infection41. Clinical manifestations of angioinvasive fungal infection include multiple painful erythematous macular or papular lesions, which usually have a necrotic center (Fig. 4)41,42. Notably, fungal infections can be mistaken for bacterial infections. In immunocompromised patients, clinicians should consider the diagnosis of mucormycosis in patients pres- enting with necrotic sinusitis or paranasal cellulitis, as well as Fusarium infection presenting with ecthyma gangrenosum-like lesions that may be mistaken for pseudomonal ecthyma42.

Figure 4. Clinical features of cutaneous aspergillosis in a 75-year-old septic man with multiple comorbidities. The diagnosis was confirmed by fungal culture, which grew Aspergillus flavus. (A) A 3-cm-sized, round, purpuric patch with central necrosis on the left eyebrow. (B) Histopathologic examination demonstrated extensive tissue necrosis (H&E, ×100). (C) PAS staining demonstrated septate fungal hyphae (blue arrows) (×400).
4. HUMORAL IMMUNODEFICIENCY

While antibody deficiencies can also occur as primary dis- orders due to inherited genetic defects, secondary immune disorders are far more prevalent and can be caused by various diseases and their treatment, certain medications, and surgical procedures32,43. Both primary and secondary humoral immunodeficiencies can affect B-cell production and function, antibody formation and function, and the effect- iveness of the complement pathway43. Deficiency in any of these components can put patients at particular risk of infection from encapsulated bacteria, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus aga- lactiae, and Neisseria species, due to the impairment of opsonization for phagocytosis and lysis of pathogens32,44.

Deficiencies of the terminal complement components (C5-C9) confer a particularly high susceptibility to invasive Neisseria infections45. Functional or anatomic asplenia hampers the clearance of opsonized encapsulated bacteria from the blood- stream, increasing the severity and risk of infections caused by encapsulated organisms44.

4.1 Meningococcemia

Meningococcemia is caused by Neisseria meningitidis. Cutaneous manifestations of meningococcemia may aid in early diagnosis, which is crucial to prevent disease progression. Acute cutaneous manifestations result from disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), inducing thrombocytopenia and widespread thrombosis; this type of hemorrhagic rash is more frequently observed in fatal cases46. Purpura fulminans is a rapidly evolving syndrome of skin microvessel thrombosis and hemorrhagic necrosis and a severe complication of invasive N. meningitidis infection with a high mortality rate47. Congenital terminal complement deficiency increases the relative risk of meningococcal infection by 1,000-fold com- pared to the general population48. Similarly, complement inhibitor therapy (eculizumab/ravulizumab) renders patients highly susceptible to this infection49. Similarly, lose opsoni- zation and IgM-mediated early defense against encapsulated organisms (S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, and H. influ- enzae), placing them at lifelong risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection and its accompanying purpura fulmi- nans (DIC-mediated skin necrosis)50.

5. CONCLUSIONS

Cutaneous lesions in immunocompromised patients with disseminated opportunistic infections must be considered an important clue to an underlying life-threatening condition. Since the causative pathogen is often difficult to determine on the basis of clinical manifestations alone, an incisional skin biopsy and microbial study can be useful. Serum pro- calcitonin levels may also help distinguish bacterial infection from other causes, whereas serum fungal markers, such as beta-D-glucan, may facilitate the diagnosis of invasive fungal  disease18. A summary of representative cutaneous infections stratified according to the underlying immune defect, along with their characteristic cutaneous clues and diagnostic approaches, is given in Table 1. Clinicians should be cautious while evaluating cutaneous lesions in immunocompromised patients because of the broad range of potential microbial etiologies and the unusual clinical manifestations of common infections in this population.

Immune defect

Representative
pathogens

Characteristic
cutaneous clues

Diagnostic
tests

Cellular
immunodeficiency

Mycobacterium
tuberculosis

Chronic plaques, nodules, or ulcers; periorificial ulceration; purpuric or umbilicated papules in disseminated TB

Skin biopsy for histopathology, AFB staining, and mycobacterial culture ± PCR

Non-tuberculous
Mycobacterium spp.

Papules, nodules, abscesses, ulcers,
or draining sinuses; sporotrichoid or
disseminated patterns may occur

Skin biopsy for histopathology, AFB staining, and mycobacterial culture ± PCR

Actinomyces spp. /
Nocardia spp.

Indurated nodules or abscesses with
draining sinuses; lymphocutaneous
spread may occur with nocardiosis

Tissue biopsy with appropriate stains and bacterial culture

Cryptococcus
neoformans

Molluscum-like or umbilicated papules,
nodules, or ulcers

Skin biopsy for histopathology and fungal culture

Talaromyces
marneffei

Papules with central necrosis or umbilication

Skin biopsy for histopathology and fungal culture

Leishmania spp.



Plaques with indurated borders and
central ulceration; generalized skin-colored papules or nodules in
diffuse cutaneous disease

Skin biopsy for histopathology,
PCR, and culture


Candida spp.

Chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis;
oral thrush, intertrigo, paronychia

Fungal culture and skin biopsy
for histopathology

HSV / VZV


Chronic or atypical ulcers (HSV);
multi-dermatomal or disseminated
vesicles (VZV)

PCR of the lesional material


CMV

Chronic, deep, or necrotic ulcers,
often in perianal or genital areas

Skin biopsy for histopathology and
CMV immunohistochemistry

Neutropenia

Pseudomonas
aeruginosa


Ecthyma gangrenosum: hemorrhagic
pustules or bullae progressing to
necrotic ulcers

Blood culture; skin biopsy for histopathology and bacterial
culture

Candida spp.


Invasive candidiasis: erythematous or
purpuric papules, pustules, or nodules,
often on the trunk and extremities

Blood culture; skin biopsy for histopathology and fungal
culture

Aspergillus spp.



Papules, nodules, or plaques with hemorrhage or central necrosis;
periorbital involvement may occur
with invasive sinusitis

Skin biopsy for histopathology
and fungal culture


Fusarium spp.

Multiple purpuric macules, papules, or
necrotic lesions with eschar formation

Blood culture; skin biopsy for histopathology and fungal culture

Mucorales


Rapidly progressive necrotic plaques or
ulcers, often with black eschar; facial or
periorbital involvement may occur

Skin biopsy for histopathology
and fungal culture

Humoral/complement
deficiency

Neisseria
meningitidis

Petechiae, purpura, ecchymoses;
purpura fulminans in severe disease

Blood culture and PCR

Abbreviations: AFB, Acid-Fast Bacillus; CMV, Cytomegalovirus; HSV, Herpes Simplex Virus; PCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction; TB, Tuberculosis; VZV, Varicella-Zoster Virus

Table 1. Summary of representative cutaneous infections in immunocompromised patients


References


1. Hoeger PH, Kinsler V, Yan AC, Harper J, Oranje AP, Bodemer C, et al. Harper's Textbook of Pediatric Dermatology. 4th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2019

2. Samia AM, Wanat KA, Elston DM, Motaparthi K. Diagnosis and management of cutaneous infections in immunocompromised hosts part I: cellular immuno- deficiency. J Am Acad Dermatol 2026;95:349-366 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2025.04.088
Google Scholar 

3. van Zyl L, du Plessis J, Viljoen J. Cutaneous tuberculosis: Overview and current treatment regimens. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2015;95:629-638 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2014.12.006
Google Scholar 

4. Leon-Mateos A, Sánchez-Aguilar D, Lado F, Toribio J. Perianal ulceration: A case of tuberculosis cutis orificialis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2005;19:364-366 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.01147.x
Google Scholar 

5. Smith KJ, Skelton HG 3rd, Angritt P. Histopathologic features of HIV-associated skin disease. Dermatol Clin 1991;9:551-578 PMID:1873932
Google Scholar 

6. Zhou G, Luo S, He J, Chen N, Zhang Y, Cai S, et al. Risk of progression to active tuberculosis for indeterminate interferon-gamma release assay in immunocompromised individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2023;29:1375-1384 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2023.07.003
Google Scholar 

7. Uslan DZ, Kowalski TJ, Wengenack NL, Virk A, Wilson JW. Skin and soft tissue infections due to rapidly growing mycobacteria: Comparison of clinical features, treatment, and susceptibility. Arch Dermatol 2006;142: 1287-1292 https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archderm.142.10.1287
Google Scholar 

8. Stengem J, Grande KK, Hsu S. Localized primary cuta- neous Mycobacterium kansasii infection in an immuno- compromised patient. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41: 854-856 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70344-0
Google Scholar 

9. Kollipara R, Richards K, Tschen J, Campbell L, Tyring S, Mays S. Disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex with cutaneous lesions. J Cutan Med Surg 2016;20:272-274 https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1203475415626088
Google Scholar 

10. Valour F, Sénéchal A, Dupieux C, Karsenty J, Lustig S, Breton P, et al. Actinomycosis: Etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and management. Infect Drug Resist 2014;7:183-197 https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S39601
Google Scholar 

11. Du B, Song Z, Ren Z, Tang D, Shen J, Yao J, et al. The global epidemiology, risk factors, and mortality prediction of nocardiosis: An easily missed opportunistic infection. Sci Rep 2025;15:42090 https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26244-1
Google Scholar 

12. Meya DB, Williamson PR. Cryptococcal disease in diverse hosts. N Engl J Med 2024;390:1597-1610 https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2311057
Google Scholar 

13. Carrasco-Zuber JE, Navarrete-Dechent C, Bonifaz A, Fich F, Vial-Letelier V, Berroeta-Mauriziano D. Cutaneous involvement in the deep mycoses: A review. Part II - Systemic mycoses. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2016;107:816-822 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2016.06.001
Google Scholar 

14. Curtis KL, Gold JAW, Ritter JM, Rosen T, Santos DWCL, Smith DJ, et al. Dermatologic fungal neglected tropical diseases-Part I: Epidemiology and clinical features. J Am Acad Dermatol 2025;92:1189-1206 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.03.056
Google Scholar 

15. Khullar G, Vignesh P, Lau YL, Rudramurthy SM, Rawat A, De D, et al. Chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2017;5:1119-1121 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2016.11.025
Google Scholar 

16. Badri M, Maartens G, Wood R. Predictors and prognostic value of oral hairy leukoplakia and oral candidiasis in South African HIV-infected patients. S Afr Dent J 2001; 56:592-596 PMID:11887444
Google Scholar 

17. Lin RY, Goodhart P. The role of oral candidiasis in survival and hospitalization patterns: analysis of an inner city hospital human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome registry. Am J Med Sci 1993;305:345-353 https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000441-199306000-00001
Google Scholar 

18. Griffiths CEM, Barker JNWN, Bleiker TO, Hussain W, Simpson RC. Rook's textbook of dermatology. 10th ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell; 2024
Google Scholar 

19. Elewski BE. Onychomycosis: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 1998;11:415-429 https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.11.3.415
Google Scholar 

20. Bays DJ, Jenkins EN, Lyman M, Chiller T, Strong N, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, et al. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis. Clin Epidemiol 2024;16:549-566 https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S459600
Google Scholar 

21. Kwon YJ, Shin JH. Candida and candidemia in Korea. Ann Clin Microbiol 2024;27:231-244 https://dx.doi.org/10.5145/ACM.2024.27.4.3
Google Scholar 

22. Guarana M, Nucci M. Acute disseminated candidiasis with skin lesions: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018;24:246-250 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.016
Google Scholar 

23. Kaye PM, Matlashewski G, Mohan S, Le Rutte E, Mondal D, Khamesipour A, et al. Vaccine value profile for leishmaniasis. Vaccine 2023;41 Suppl 2:S153-S175 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.057
Google Scholar 

24. Bogdan C. Leishmaniasis in rheumatology, haematology and oncology: Epidemiological, immunological and clinical aspects and caveats. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71: i60-i66 https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200596
Google Scholar 

25. Bacellar O, Lessa H, Schriefer A, Machado P, Ribeiro de Jesus A, Dutra WO, et al. Up-regulation of Th1-type responses in mucosal leishmaniasis patients. Infect Immun 2002;70:6734-6740 https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.12.6734-6740.2002
Google Scholar 

26. Aronson NE, Joya CA. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: Updates in diagnosis and management. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2019;33:101-117 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2018.10.004
Google Scholar 

27. Siegal FP, Lopez C, Hammer GS, Brown AE, Kornfeld SJ, Gold J, et al. Severe acquired immunodeficiency in male homosexuals, manifested by chronic perianal ulcerative herpes simplex lesions. N Engl J Med 1981;305:1439-1444 https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198112103052403
Google Scholar 

28. Urquiaga M, Winthrop KL, Curtis JR. Vaccination update and specific concerns for RA. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2025; 27:37 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11926-025-01197-6
Google Scholar 

29. Agrawal S, Hutson SD, Johnson EF, Alavi A. Cytomegalovirus-induced cutaneous ulcers: A case series. JAAD Case Rep 2025;61:123-128 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdcr.2025.04.016
Google Scholar 

30. Lee JY. Cytomegalovirus infection involving the skin in immunocompromised hosts: A clinicopathologic study. Am J Clin Pathol 1989;92:96-100 https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/92.1.96
Google Scholar 

31. Malech HL, DeLeo FR, Quinn MT. The role of neutrophils in the immune system: An overview. Methods Mol Biol 2014;1124:3-10 https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-845-4_1
Google Scholar 

32. Boswell N, Punyamurthy N, Motaparthi K, Elston D, Wanat KA. Diagnosis and management of cutaneous infections in immunocompromised hosts part II: Neutro- penia and humoral immunodeficiency. J Am Acad Dermatol 2026;95:369-380 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2025.04.087
Google Scholar 

33. Villafuerte-Gutierrez P, Villalon L, Losa JE, Henriquez-Camacho C. Treatment of febrile neutropenia and pro- phylaxis in hematologic malignancies: a critical review and update. Adv Hematol 2014;2014:986938 https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/986938
Google Scholar 

34. Teo WY, Chan MY, Lam CM, Chong CY. Skin mani- festation of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection: A case report and review article. Ann Acad Med Singap 2006;35:897-900 PMID:17219003
Google Scholar 

35. Al-Anazi KA, Al-Jasser AM. Infections caused by Steno-trophomonas maltophilia in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Front Oncol 2014;4:232 https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00232
Google Scholar 

36. Falagas ME, Kastoris AC, Vouloumanou EK, Dimopoulos G. Community-acquired Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: A systematic review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2009;28:719-730 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0709-5
Google Scholar 

37. Dagenais TR, Keller NP. Pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus in invasive aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2009;22:447-465 https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00055-08
Google Scholar 

38. Maddy AJ, Sanchez N, Shukla BS, Maderal AD. Dermato- logical manifestations of fungal infection in patients with febrile neutropaenia: A review of the literature. Mycoses 2019;62:826-834 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/myc.12928
Google Scholar 

39. Ranawaka RR, Nagahawatte A, Gunasekara TA. Fusarium onychomycosis: Prevalence, clinical presentations, re- sponse to itraconazole and terbinafine pulse therapy, and 1-year follow-up in nine cases. Int J Dermatol 2015; 54:1275-1282 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijd.12906
Google Scholar 

40. Bongomin F, Batac CR, Richardson MD, Denning DW. A review of onychomycosis due to Aspergillus species. Mycopathologia 2018;183:485-493 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11046-017-0222-9
Google Scholar 

41. Nucci M, Anaissie E. Cutaneous infection by Fusarium species in healthy and immunocompromised hosts: Implications for diagnosis and management. Clin Infect Dis 2002;35:909-920 https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/342328
Google Scholar 

42. Mardani M, Khodashahi R, Lotfali E, Abolghasemi S, Hakemi-Vala M. Disseminated Fusarium infection with ecthyma gangrenosum-like lesions in a refractory acute myeloid leukemia patient. Curr Med Mycol 2019;5:27-31 https://dx.doi.org/10.18502/cmm.5.1.534
Google Scholar 

43. Srivastava S, Wood P. Secondary antibody deficiency: Causes and approach to diagnosis. Clin Med (Lond) 2016;16:571-576 https://dx.doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.16-6-571
Google Scholar 

44. Ram S, Lewis LA, Rice PA. Infections of people with com- plement deficiencies and patients who have undergone splenectomy. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010;23:740-780 https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00048-09
Google Scholar 

45. Lewis LA, Ram S. Complement interactions with the pathogenic Neisseriae: clinical features, deficiency states, and evasion mechanisms. FEBS Lett 2020;594:2670-2694 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13760
Google Scholar 

46. Thompson MJ, Ninis N, Perera R, Mayon-White R, Phillips C, Bailey L, et al. Clinical recognition of meningococcal disease in children and adolescents. Lancet 2006;367: 397-403 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67932-4
Google Scholar 

47. Lécuyer H, Borgel D, Nassif X, Coureuil M. Pathogenesis of meningococcal purpura fulminans. Pathog Dis 2017; 75:ftx027 https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftx027
Google Scholar 

48. Lewis LA, Ram S. Meningococcal disease and the complement system. Virulence 2014;5:98-126 https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/viru.26515
Google Scholar 

49. Carrillo Infante C, Mujeebuddin A. Eculizumab and ravuli- zumab clinical trial and real-world pharmacovigilance of meningococcal infections across indications. PLoS One 2025;20:e0332073 https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332073
Google Scholar 

50. Di Sabatino A, Carsetti R, Corazza GR. Post-splenectomy and hyposplenic states. Lancet 2011;378:86-97 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61493-6
Google Scholar 

Congratulatory MessageClick here!

Download this article