pISSN : 3058-423X eISSN: 3058-4302
Open Access, Peer-reviewed
Hyun-Min Seo,Ji Hun Park,Joung Soo Kim
10.17966/JMI.2024.29.4.175 Epub 2025 January 03
Abstract
Cutaneous infections are a significant concern in patients with malignancies, due to immunocompromised from both the underlying disease and its treatment. This review aims to explore the etiology, pathogenesis, and clinical management challenges of cutaneous infections in cancer patients, focusing on viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens. Early recognition and accurate diagnosis are crucial in managing these infections. Treatment typically involves targeted antimicrobial therapies, with surgical intervention deemed necessary in severe cases.
Keywords
Chemotherapy Cutaneous infection Immunocompromised host Malignancy
Cancer continues to be a major global health challenge, with both its incidence rates and burden steadily increasing. In 2019 alone, an estimated 23.6 million new cancer cases and 10 million cancer-related deaths occurred worldwide1, marking a substantial increase from 2010, with new cases rising by 26.3% and deaths by 20.9% over the decade. The global burden of cancer, measured in disability-adjusted life years, also reached 250 million in 2019, underscoring the need for enhanced prevention and treatment strategies. The impact of cancer varies across different sociodemographic regions, with the largest increases observed in lower and lower-middle-income countries.
Cytotoxic therapy for cancer can significantly impair host defense mechanisms, thereby increasing the risk of infections. Such defense mechanisms encompass humoral immunity, such as complement cascade and immunoglobulins, cell-mediated immunity, including thymus-derived T lymphocytes, bone marrow-derived phagocytes, such as monocytes/ macrophages and neutrophils, and the integrity of the host's integument. The integrity of these defense mechanisms can be further compromised by factors such as the patient's pre-existing health conditions, the nature and characteristics of the underlying cancer, and the impact of anticancer treat- ments2.
Cutaneous infections are prevalent among immunocompromised patients, particularly those with neutropenia, which increases susceptibility to fungal, bacterial, and viral infections. Consequently, prophylactic use of antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral agents can significantly reduce the incidence of these infections. Cutaneous infections in this population can be categorized into two main types: primary cutaneous infections and infections occurring as part of a widespread systemic infection3.
Breakthrough invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are defined as infections that occur despite the ongoing use of anti- fungal prophylaxis or therapy4. These infections can be caused by pathogens that fall outside the spectrum of activity of the antifungal agents used or by organisms that have developed resistance to the antifungal drugs5. The mechanisms underlying breakthrough IFIs include factors such as host immunosuppression, fungal resistance to antifungal agents, inadequate drug levels due to pharmacokinetic variability, and the presence of fungal biofilms on medical devices, which can protect pathogens from antifungal agents6,7. Additionally, certain antifungal drugs may induce changes in fungal virulence or promote the emergence of resistant strains, further complicating treatment.
In this manuscript, we explore the etiology and patho- genesis of cutaneous infections in malignancy, along with the associated challenges in clinical management.
Herpes simplex infection
In 2016, an estimated 3.7 billion people, representing approximately 66.6% of the global population aged 0~49 years, were infected with Herpes simplex virus (HSV-1). Additionally, approximately 491.5 million people, or 13.2% of the world's population aged 15~49 years, were infected with HSV-28. The prevalence of HSV infection or reactivation is notably higher among cancer patients9. HSV infections are a significant concern in cancer patients due to their com-promised immune systems. Reactivation of HSV, particularly HSV-1, is common in this population and is often associated with chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis10. Although HSV is frequently isolated from tissue specimens in cancers such as oral squamous cell carcinoma, esophageal cancer, and cervical cancer, its role in carcinogenesis remains unproven11. However, cancer patients undergoing treatments that weaken their immune system, such as myelosuppressive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), are at higher risk for severe HSV complications, including visceral infections like esophagitis, pneumonitis, and encephalitis12. Treatment of HSV mucocutaneous infection or esophagitis can involve the intravenous administration of acyclovir at a dose of 250 mg /m2 or 5 mg/kg every 8 hours. Alternatively, oral treatment options include acyclovir at 400 mg five times per day, vala- cyclovir at 500~1,000 mg every 12 hours, or famciclovir at 500 mg every 12 hours. For HSV visceral, disseminated, or central nervous system disease, the recommended treatment is acyclovir at 500 mg/m2 or 10 mg/kg, given intravenously every 8 hours9.
Herpes zoster infection
Herpes zoster (HZ), caused by the varicella-zoster virus, is a common complication following HSCT, with incidence rates ranging of 17~50% in allogeneic and 14~28% in autologous transplant recipients13. Most HZ cases occur within the first year posttransplant, typically around 5~6 months14. The risk of HZ significantly increases in patients with various immuno-compromizing conditions, with the highest incidence observed among HSCT recipients, where rates vary depending on the type of transplant and the prophylaxis regimen used. Patients with hematologic malignancies are also a high-risk group for HZ, particularly those undergoing chemotherapy. Solid organ transplant recipients experience varying levels of HZ risk, with the highest rates noted in heart and lung transplant patients15. In contrast, individuals with solid tumors generally have a lower risk for opportunistic infections due to less significant compromise of the cellular immune system, though their HZ risk remains elevated compared to the general population16. Treatment of HZ can involve the intravenous administration of acyclovir at a dose of 500 mg/m2 or 10 mg/kg every 8 hours. Alternatively, depending on the patient's clinical presentation and immune status9, oral treatment options include acyclovir at 800 mg five times per day, valacyclovir at 1,000 mg every 8 hours, or famciclovir at 500 mg every 8 hours.
Cytomegalovirus
Human Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a widespread virus with seroprevalence increasing with age: 10~20% of children are infected before puberty, rising to 40~100% by adulthood. Immunocompromised patients, particularly those undergoing chemotherapy for lymphoma, are at significant risk for both primary CMV infection and reactivation17. This can lead to persistent viremia and disseminated systemic disease, with CMV end-organ disease affecting organs such as the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, liver, eyes, and central nervous system. In patients with aggressive lymphoma, especially those treated with rituximab and HyperCVAD regimens (a chemotherapy regimen consisting of hyperfractionated Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone), the risk of CMV reactivation is notably high18. Severe complications, including CMV retinitis, pneumonia, and myelitis, are common and require close monitoring and prompt antiviral treatment.
Skin and soft tissue infection
Cellulitis and erysipelas are most commonly caused by Group A β-hemolytic streptococci (Streptococcus pyogenes) and Staphylococcus aureus, including Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. However, identi- fying the causative organism is often challenging, with suc- cess achieved in fewer than one-third of all cases. While erysipelas was historically attributed solely to streptococci, recent studies indicate a microbial profile similar to that of classic cellulitis19. Other less common pathogens include Group B, C, and G streptococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci, which are more relevant in hospitalized patients. These patients are more susceptible to infections from a broader range of pathogens, including gram-negative bacteria and unusual organisms such as Cryptococcus neoformans, Serratia marcescens, and Campylobacter fetus20-23. The presence of systemic immunosuppression, whether due to conditions like HIV/AIDS, chemotherapy, or organ transplantation, further increases the risk of severe and recurrent cellulitis. In these cases, prompt identification and treatment with appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics are crucial to managing the infection and preventing further complications. Early biopsy or aspiration for histologic and microbiological review is often recommended to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment in these vulnerable patients24. While outpatient therapy with oral antibiotics is suitable for stable patients without systemic infection, hospitalization is often necessary for immunocompromised patients or those experiencing treatment failure. For nonpurulent cellulitis, anti- streptococcal agents like cephalexin, dicloxacillin, or penicillin are recommended. In patients with penicillin allergy, clinda- mycin or macrolides can serve as alternative options. For severe or systemic infections, intravenous antibiotics such as cefazolin or ceftriaxone are used, while vancomycin is added if MRSA is suspected. For purulent cellulitis, incision and drainage are essential, and empiric therapy should cover Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or MRSA. Cephalexin or dicloxacillin is first-line therapy for MSSA, while clindamycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is used for MRSA. Severe infections in cancer patients require broad-spectrum antibiotics, often including MRSA coverage, with therapy adjustments based on culture results24,25.
Gram-negative infections
Cutaneous lesions occur in approximately 30% of Pseudo- monas bacteremia cases, with the respiratory or genitourinary tracts being the most common sites of origin26. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections can also be acquired from humid environments, such as showers, sinks, and flower vases3. The dermatologic manifestations of Pseudomonas sepsis include ecthyma gangrenosum, hemorrhagic bullae, necrotizing or bullous cellulitis, painful vesicular lesions, small papules on the trunk resembling rose spots of typhoid fever, grouped petechiae, erysipelas-like lesions with hyperesthesia, erythematous or violaceous subcutaneous painful nodules, and necro- tizing or malignant external otitis27. Ecthyma gangrenosum is traditionally considered a pathognomonic sign of Pseudo-monas aeruginosa septicemia, though it can also occur as a result of other gram-negative bacterial, fungal, and viral infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals3.
Cutaneous candidiasis
Candida yeasts are ubiquitous in the environment and are common commensals of human skin, as well as oropharyngeal, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genital mucosa. Candidal colonization has been reported in the oral mucosa of over 40% of healthy adults, with higher carriage rates among women and smokers28. Of over than 200 Candida species, at least 15 have been implicated in human disease. While Candida albicans is the most commonly implicated species in localized mucocutaneous candidiasis, an increasing number of other species, including Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida dubliniensis, are also associated with mucocutaneous disease. Addition- ally, although C. albicans remains the single most common species, nonalbicans species collectively now account for the majority of cases with invasive candidiasis and candidemia29. In immunocompromised patients, cutaneous candidiasis often presents similarly to cases in immunocompetent individuals, with conditions like intertrigo and vaginitis common observed. However, these infections may occur more frequently in patients undergoing systemic antibiotic or steroid treatments during oncologic care. While most superficial infections can be managed with topical antifungal treatments, disseminated candidiasis is a significant concern in these patients, particu- larly in those with hematologic malignancies or those who have undergone stem-cell transplantation. In these cases, nonalbicans species, such as Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, and Candida tropicalis, are increasingly implicated30. The cutaneous manifestations of disseminated candidiasis include pink papules, which may lead to eschar formation or skin necrosis, and are often accompanied by a high mortality rate, underscoring the need for prompt recognition and treat- ment3. Treatment of cutaneous candidiasis typically involves topical antifungal agents such as clotrimazole, nystatin, and miconazole, which are highly effective, achieving cure rates of 73~100%. In more severe or resistant cases, systemic anti- fungal therapy may be required, with oral fluconazole being a common choice due to its superior efficacy, comparable to that of topical treatments31.
Fusariosis
Skin manifestations occur in up to 70% of patients with fusariosis, presenting as either localized or disseminated in- fections. Neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies are particularly at high risk for this mold infection. Fungal paronychia is a key clinical presentation of localized fusarium infection in this population3,32. Histological findings typically reveal narrow, septated hyphae with 45° branching, along with club-shaped pseudohyphae. Triazoles, such as vorico- nazole, are the preferred antifungal treatment, with liposomal amphotericin B recommended if triazoles are contraindicated33.
Mucormycosis
Mucormycosis is a serious but rare fungal infection caused by molds known as mucormycetes, which are prevalent in environments such as soil and decaying organic matter. This infection is particularly aggressive in immunocompromised individuals, including those with hematological malignancies, recipients of HSCT, and patients with extensive burns, where the all-cause mortality rates range from 40% to 80%34. The infection is difficult to diagnose and progresses rapidly, making early intervention critical35. The standard treatment involves high-dose liposomal amphotericin B, with surgical debride- ment often necessary to manage the infection effectively. In cases where triazoles like voriconazole are contraindicated, liposomal amphotericin B is recommended as an alternative treatment36.
Following organ transplantation, the risk and type of in- fections change over time. Within the first four weeks post-transplant, bacterial infections from surgical complications and hospital-acquired pathogens are most common, along with early viral infections such as herpesviruses. Between 1 and 12 months post-transplant, the risk shifts toward viral infections like cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), along with fungal infections such as Aspergillus and Candida, and bacterial infections, particularly from oppor- tunistic pathogens. After 12 months, the focus centers on community-acquired infections including viruses, bacteria, and fungi, as well as late-occurring parasitic infections like Toxoplasma gondii37.
In summary, the present review highlights the significant association between malignancy and the increased risk of cutaneous infections. Patients with malignancies are vulner- able to these infections, which are often exacerbated by the immunosuppressive effects of both the malignancy itself and its treatment. These infections present unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, making prompt and accurate diagnosis, as well as early and aggressive treatment with antibiotics, antivirals, and antifungals, crucial for managing these potentially life-threatening conditions.
References
1. Kocarnik JM, Compton K, Dean FE, Fu W, Gaw BL, Harvey JD, et al. Cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life years for 29 cancer groups from 2010 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. JAMA Oncol 2022;8:420-444
Google Scholar
2. Bow EJ. Infection risk and cancer chemotherapy: the impact of the chemotherapeutic regimen in patients with lymphoma and solid tissue malignancies. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;41 Suppl D:1-5
Google Scholar
3. Rihana N, Sampson M. Skin Infections. In: Velez AP, Lamarche J, Greene JN, editors. Infections in Neutropenic Cancer Patients. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019:49-71
Google Scholar
4. Cornely OA, Lass-Flörl C, Lagrou K, Arsic-Arsenijevic V, Hoenigl M. Improving outcome of fungal diseases - Guiding experts and patients towards excellence. Mycoses 2017;60:420-425
Google Scholar
5. Jenks JD, Cornely OA, Chen SC, Thompson GR 3rd, Hoenigl M. Breakthrough invasive fungal infections: Who is at risk? Mycoses 2020;63:1021-1032
Google Scholar
6. Maschmeyer G, Patterson TF. Our 2014 approach to breakthrough invasive fungal infections. Mycoses 2014; 57:645-651
Google Scholar
7. Perlin DS, Rautemaa-Richardson R, Alastruey-Izquierdo A. The global problem of antifungal resistance: prevalence, mechanisms, and management. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17:e383-e392
Google Scholar
8. James C, Harfouche M, Welton NJ, Turner KM, Abu-Raddad LJ, Gottlieb SL, et al. Herpes simplex virus: global infection prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull World Health Organ 2020;98:315-329
Google Scholar
9. Tayyar R, Ho D. Herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus infections in cancer patients. Viruses 2023;15:439
Google Scholar
10. Hong J, Park HK, Park S, Lee A, Lee YH, Shin DY, et al. Strong association between herpes simplex virus-1 and chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in patients with hematologic malignancies. Korean J Intern Med 2020; 35:1188-1198
Google Scholar
11. Jalouli J, Jalouli MM, Sapkota D, Ibrahim SO, Larsson PA, Sand L. Human papilloma virus, herpes simplex virus and epstein barr virus in oral squamous cell carcinoma from eight different countries. Anticancer Res 2012;32: 571-580
Google Scholar
12. Forman SJ, Negrin RS, Antin JH, Appelbaum FR. Thomas' hematopoietic cell transplantation: stem cell transplan- tation: John Wiley & Sons, 2015
Google Scholar
13. Schuchter LM, Wingard JR, Piantadosi S, Burns WH, Santos GW, Saral R. Herpes zoster infection after auto- logous bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1989;74: 1424-1427
Google Scholar
14. Erard V, Guthrie KA, Varley C, Heugel J, Wald A, Flowers ME, et al. One-year acyclovir prophylaxis for preventing varicella-zoster virus disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation: no evidence of rebound varicella-zoster virus disease after drug discontinuation. Blood 2007;110: 3071-3077
Google Scholar
15. McKay SL, Guo A, Pergam SA, Dooling K. Herpes zoster risk in immunocompromised adults in the United States: A Systematic Review. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:e125-e134
Google Scholar
16. Kim ST, Park KH, Oh SC, Seo JH, Shin SW, Kim JS, et al. Varicella zoster virus infection during chemotherapy in solid cancer patients. Oncology 2012;82:126-130
Google Scholar
17. Drozd B, Andriescu E, Suárez A, De La Garza Bravo MM. Cutaneous cytomegalovirus manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment: a review. Dermatol Online J 2019;25: 13030
Google Scholar
18. Tay MR, Lim ST, Tao M, Quek RH, Tay K, Tan TT. Cyto- megalovirus infection and end-organ disease in Asian patients with lymphoma receiving chemotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma 2014;55:182-187
Google Scholar
19. Gunderson CG, Martinello RA. A systematic review of bacteremias in cellulitis and erysipelas. J Infect 2012;64: 148-155
Google Scholar
20. Khan T, Martin DH. Streptococcus pneumoniae soft tissue infections in human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Med Sci 2011;342:235-238
Google Scholar
21. Vuichard D, Conen A, Brenner M, Itin P, Flückiger U. Bullous cellulitis with Cryptococcus neoformans. Infection 2011;39:181-182
Google Scholar
22. Ichiyama S, Hirai S, Minami T, Nishiyama Y, Shimizu S, Shimokata K, et al. Campylobacter fetus subspecies fetus cellulitis associated with bacteremia in debilitated hosts. Clin Infect Dis 1998;27:252-255
Google Scholar
23. Bonner MJ, Meharg JG, Jr. Primary cellulitis due to Serratia marcescens. JAMA 1983;250:2348-2349
Google Scholar
24. Raff AB, Kroshinsky D. Cellulitis: A Review. JAMA 2016; 316:325-337
Google Scholar
25. 25. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJ, Gorbach SL, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2014;59:e10-52
Google Scholar
26. Bodey GP, Bolivar R, Fainstein V, Jadeja L. Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Rev Infect Dis 1983;5:279-313
Google Scholar
27. Grossman ME, Fox LP, Kovarik C, Rosenbach M. Cutane- ous manifestations of infection in the immunocompro- mised host: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012
Google Scholar
28. Arendorf TM, Walker DM. The prevalence and intra-oral distribution of Candida albicans in man. Arch Oral Biol 1980;25:1-10
Google Scholar
29. Horn DL, Neofytos D, Anaissie EJ, Fishman JA, Steinbach WJ, Olyaei AJ, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 2019 patients: data from the prospective antifungal therapy alliance registry. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:1695-1703
Google Scholar
30. Marr KA. Invasive Candida infections: the changing epidemiology. Oncology (Williston Park) 2004;18:9-14
Google Scholar
31. Taudorf EH, Jemec GBE, Hay RJ, Saunte DML. Cutaneous candidiasis - an evidence-based review of topical and systemic treatments to inform clinical practice. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019;33:1863-1873
Google Scholar
32. Boutati EI, Anaissie EJ. Fusarium, a significant emerging pathogen in patients with hematologic malignancy: ten years' experience at a cancer center and implications for management. Blood 1997;90:999-1008
Google Scholar
33. Khatri AM, Natori Y, Anderson A, Jabr R, Shah SA, Natori A, et al. Breakthrough invasive fungal infections on isavuconazole prophylaxis in hematologic malignancy & hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Transpl Infect Dis 2023;25 Suppl 1:e14162
Google Scholar
34. Petrikkos G, Skiada A, Lortholary O, Roilides E, Walsh TJ, Kontoyiannis DP. Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54 Suppl 1:S23-34
Google Scholar
35. Ibrahim AS, Spellberg B, Walsh TJ, Kontoyiannis DP. Pathogenesis of mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54 Suppl 1:S16-22
Google Scholar
36. Cornely OA, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Arenz D, Chen SCA, Dannaoui E, Hochhegger B, et al. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis: an initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Lancet Infect Dis 2019;19:e405-e421
Google Scholar
37. Fishman JA. Infection in organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 2017;17:856-879
Google Scholar
Congratulatory MessageClick here!