Comparative Study of Benzoyl Peroxide Versus Clindamycin Phosphate in Treatment of Pitted Keratolysis
Beom Joon Kim,Kyoung Un Park,Ji Young Kim,Ji Young Ahn,Chong Hyun Won,Jong Hee Lee,Nark Kyoung Rho,Soo Hong Kim,So Yun Cho,Oh Sang Kwon,Chang Hun Huh,Sang Woong Youn,Myeung Nam Kim,Byung In Ro
Epub 2016 February 20
- 0
- Cited By
Abstract
Background: Pitted keratolysis (PK) is a bacterial infection of the stratum corneum. The infection is characterized by
1 to 7 mm discrete and coalescing craterlike pits on the plantar surfaces of the feet and toes, especially the weight-bearing areas. Topically applied antibiotics such as clindamycin, benzoyl peroxide erythromycin, and clotrimazole are curative.
Objective: We performed this study to compare treatment efficacy of benzoyl peroxide (BP) and clindamycin phosphate (CP) in PK.
Method: The clinical study was made in 44 patients with PK. Among 44 patients, 17 patients were treated by BP topical application alone, 15 patients treated by CP. And the others by combined topical application of BP and CP.
Result: There were no significant differences in the treatment efficacy between BP and CP, and between monotherapy and combination therapy, neither.
1) Gender ratio showed extreme male predominance (M:F = 43:1), and the mean age of onset was 22 years old.
2) Mean disease duration was 2.8 months and mean period for complete cure was 2.6 weeks. And there was no significant relation between disease duration and mean period for complete cure.
3) Hyperhidrosis (18.1%) was the most commonly associated condition with PK. The followings were Tinea pedis (13.6%), T. cruris (6.8%), erythrasma (6.8%), cellulitis (6.8%), osmidrosis (6.8%), wart (6.8%), and corn (6.8%) in the order of frequency.
4) There was no statistically significant difference in the treatment efficacy between BP and CP (p>0.05).
5) Among 44 patients, irritation was observed in 4 cases (9.1%). Two cases were related with BP, and the others with CP. But these adverse effects were trivial and disappeared soon.
6) Four cases (9.1%) showed recurrence within 3 month-follow up. And they were all related with hyperhidrosis. There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence rate between BP and CP, although patients treated with CP showed slightly higher recurrence rate (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Our study shows that no significant difference in the treatment efficacy between benzoyl peroxide and clindamycin phosphate, and between monotherapy and combined therapy, neither. Therefore, combination therapy should be spared for only intractable PK.
Keywords
Pitted Keratolysis Benzoyl peroxide Clindamycin
KJMM
2005 December;10(4):144-150(7). Epub 2016 February 20
Copyright © 2005 by Korean Journal of Medical Mycology
Language
Korean/English
Author
Beom Joon Kim; Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Kyoung Un Park; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Ji Young Kim; Department of Dermatology, Chung Ang Univerisity College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Ji Young Ahn; Department of Dermatology, Chung Ang Univerisity College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Chong Hyun Won; Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Jong Hee Lee; Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Nark Kyoung Rho; Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Sungnam, Korea
Soo Hong Kim; Pohang Special Security Area Medical Hospital, Pohang, Korea
So Yun Cho; Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Oh Sang Kwon; Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Chang Hun Huh; Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Sang Woong Youn; Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Myeung Nam Kim; Department of Dermatology, Chung Ang Univerisity College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Byung In Ro; Department of Dermatology, Chung Ang Univerisity College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Corresponding
Myeung Nam Kim, Department of Dermatology, Chung Ang Univerisity College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Tel: (02) 748-9573, Fax: (02) 6359-9573, e-mail: mnkim@cau.ac.kr
Publication history
Acknowledgements
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Beom Joon Kim
Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Kyoung Un Park
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Ji Young Kim
Department of Dermatology, Chung Ang Univerisity College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Ji Young Ahn
Department of Dermatology, Chung Ang Univerisity College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Chong Hyun Won
Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Jong Hee Lee
Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Nark Kyoung Rho
Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Sungnam, Korea
Soo Hong Kim
Pohang Special Security Area Medical Hospital, Pohang, Korea
So Yun Cho
Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Oh Sang Kwon
Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Chang Hun Huh
Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Sang Woong Youn
Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
Myeung Nam Kim
Department of Dermatology, Chung Ang Univerisity College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Byung In Ro
Department of Dermatology, Chung Ang Univerisity College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Download : 379
- Image : 0
- DOC : 0
- XLS : 0
- PDF : 379
Since epub date 2016 February 20